Skip to content

Example build · Alerts and reporting

The right alert to the right person, and the recurring reports ready on time.

Two jobs keep a security team busy without moving the program forward: telling the right person when something needs them, and producing the same reports again and again. We built automations for both. People still act on the alerts and sign off on the reports.

An alert and a report

Example
Alert
A critical vendor reported an incident
Sent to
The vendor owner and the security lead
Alert
Evidence for an audit control is about to expire
Sent to
The person who owns that control
Report
Monthly leadership summary, drafted from current records
NextOwners act on alerts; the security lead releases the report

The situation

Alerts went to everyone or no one, and the same reports were rebuilt by hand.

When something changes, the person who needs to act is often not the person who sees it first. Alerts sent to a shared channel get ignored, and alerts that never get sent mean a problem sits until someone happens to look.

Reporting has the same shape. Leadership asks for a regular summary and auditors ask for the same evidence each cycle, so the team spends time reassembling familiar documents from the same sources.

We built automations for both, working with your existing tools. They are scoped as their own project, apart from the managed program.

What we built

What we built, in order.

Your tools and records stay the source of truth. The automations read from them and send messages and drafts, and they do not replace them.

  1. Watch · Rules in code

    Watch the events that matter in your existing tools and records.

  2. Route · Rules in code

    Decide who needs to know, from a written list of who owns what.

  3. Alert · AI step

    Send a short message: what happened, why it matters, what to do next.

  4. Report · AI step

    On a schedule, assemble the recurring report from current records.

  5. Act · Person

    Owners act on alerts. The security lead reviews reports before they go out.

What changed

The right people hear about changes, and the recurring reports are ready when asked.

Alerts reach the person who owns the problem, and the regular reports arrive drafted instead of rebuilt. We have no before-and-after figures to publish.

Control and vendor owners
Hear about the things that are theirs, with what to do next, and not about everything else.
Security lead
Reviews drafted reports instead of assembling them, and spends the time on what the report shows.
Leadership and auditors
Receive the same report in the same shape each period.
Vectra View
Builds it as a scoped project. Later changes to alerts, owners or reports are scoped with you.

Have a process like this?

Tell us which review or routing step your team repeats and we will tell you whether it is a good fit.